当前位置:资格考试>导游资格

问题:

[单选] 导游人员能够自觉抵制各种“旅游污染”,需要具备(  )。

A . 高尚的情操、健康的思想、正派的生活作风
B . 健康的思想、正派的生活作风、良好的职业道德
C . 较高的道德修养、坚定的意志、高度的思想觉悟
D . 情操修养、道德修养、学风修养、文化修养

导游服务中的转移是指(  )。 由某一景点向另一个景点移动的过程。 由所下榻的饭店向游览点移动的过程。 由机场向所下榻的饭店移动的过程。 将游客送往离站地点的过程。 旅游团离开旅游地的前一天,地陪应做好旅游团离开的交通票据的核实工作,通常地 陪要进行的“四核实”是指:(  )。 核实团名、人数、团队代号、旅游者的姓名是否与有效证件吻合。 计划时间、时刻表时间、票面时间、问讯时四核实是对时间的核实。的核实。 叫早时间、出行李时间、用餐时问、出发时间的核实。 交接行李的时间、饭店与旅游者是否结清有关账目、起程的机场(车站、码头)的位 置、提醒全陪向下一站做好交接工作。 导游服务工作的个性体现在(  )。 经济性。 政治性。 文化性。 涉外性。 根据以下资料,回答{TSE}题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. {TS}Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.。 disturbed the power balance between different states.。 overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.。 contradicted both the federal and state policies.。 导游人员能够自觉抵制各种“旅游污染”,需要具备(  )。
参考答案:

  参考解析

本题暂无解析

相关题目:

在线 客服