2017年黑龙江大学055综合朝鲜语之语言学教程复试实战预测五套卷
● 摘要
一、Explain-the-fllowing-terms
1. Concordance
【答案】 The computer has the ability to search for a particular word , sequence of words , or perhaps even a part of speech in a text. The computer can also retrieve all examples of a particular word. It can also calculate the number of occurrences of a certain word so that information on the frequency of the word may be gathered. We may also be interested in sorting the data in some way—for example, alphabetically on words occurring in the immediate context of the word. This is usually referred to as concordance.
2. Conceptualism
It is the view which holds that there is no direct link between a linguistic form and what it 【答案】
refers to; rather, in the interpretation of meaning they are linked through the mediation of concepts in the mind.
3. Distinctive features of speech sounds
【答案】 The distinctive feature is a property which distinguishes one phoneme from another. For example , “voicing” is a distinctive feature, since it plays an important role in distinguishing obstruents in English.
4. Language Acquisition Device (LAD )
【答案】 Language Acquisition Device: LAD refers to an innate faculty of language in general with which children are bom. It is posited by Chomsky , who argues that LAD probably consists of three elements : a hypothesis-maker, linguistic universal, and an evaluation procedure.
5. grammatical word
【答案】 It refers to those which mainly work for constructing group , phrase , clause , clause complex , or even text , such as , conjunctions , prepositions , articles , and pronouns. Grammatical words serve to link together different content parts. So they are also known as Function Words.
6. MT
【答案】 It refers to machine translation, the use of machine (usually computers) to translate texts from one natural language to another
7. Assimilation
【答案】 It is a process by which one sound takes on some or all the characteristics of a neighboring sound. It is often used synonymously with coarticulation. Nasalization, dentalization and,velarization are all instances of assimilation. There are two possibilities of assimilation: if a following sound is influencing a preceding sound, it is regressive assimilation;
the converse process, in which a preceding sound is influencing a following sound, is known as
progressive assimilation. For example, in “mink”,“n”,which is originally pronounced as
velarized by the following “k”/k/,and therefore the word will be pronounced as
8. Concord (or : Agreement) will be
【答案】 It may be defined as the requirement that the forms of two or more words of specific word classes that stand in specific syntactic relationship with one another shall also be characterized by the same paradigmatically marked category (or categories ) . For example, the syntactic relationship between that girl and she in the following dialogue: A: Who is that girl? B: Oh, she is my sister.
二、Essay-question
9. Read the following quote from Chomsky. What do you think about Chomsky^ criticism and the revival of corpus linguistics?
It seems clear that the description which is of greatest psychological relevance is the account of competence , not that of performance, for anyone concerned with intellectual processes, or any question that goes beyond mere data arranging, it is the question of competence that is fundamental. ...
These rather obvious comments apply directly to study of language, child or adult. This it is absurd to attempt to construct a grammar that describes observed linguistic behaviour directly ,…a direct record —an actual corpus —is almost useless as it stands , for linguistic analysis of any but the most superficial kind. ...
【答案】 Regarding linguistics as a branch of psychology, Chomsky insisted that what should be studied is linguistic competence , not performance. As he has claimed , the description of language performance only tells what is there, and is very inadequate in telling why language performs in the way as it does, or rather, how the intellectual processes affects it.
What 's more, language performance is more than often degenerated; there are false statements, hesitations , and so on. Therefore, the corpus linguistics which is based on the language performance is somewhat distorted from the goal of linguistics. Because , according to Chomsky , what linguistics is aimed for , should be the discovering of the constants , the general principle which all languages are constructed and operated as systems of communication in societies in which they are used.
Therefore , he suggested the construction of universal grammar, which is the ideal knowledge of language , is what linguists should be concerned with , and the postulation of grammar based on the observed behavior is also a distortion.
10.Think of the four maxims of the Cooperative Principle proposed by P. Grice, and explain the violation of maxims in the cases below.
1)A : Have you seen my watch?
B : Look in the drawer.
2)A : Reno s the capital of Nevada.
B : Yeah, London s the capital of New Jersey.
3)A : I really liked that dinner.
B : Tm a vegetarian.
4)A : Let‟s dine out with the kids this weekend
B : Okay, but not M-c-D-o-n-a-l-d-s.
【答案】 The four maxims of the Cooperative Principle proposed by P. Grice are the maxim of
quantity , the maxim of quality, the maxim of relation and the maxim of manner.
In (1) , B violates the maxim of quantity, for his/her not giving enough information to A9s question. B does not answer “yes” or “no” to a yes-no question,so A doesn‟t know whether B is sure it is in the draw. But B says this way may imply he/she is unsure about it (look at the drawer, maybe it is there ), or he/she is sure (just go get it, it is in the drawer).
In (2), B violates the maxim of quality. Apparently London is not the capital of New Jersey. What
B says is a false statement, and B knows it is false. But B says it to imply that A9s statement is also false, that is, Reno is not the capital of Nevada.
In (3) , B violates the maxim of relations. B does not talk about “that dinner” directly but with “I‟m a vegetarian instead. Although the two utterances are not relevant superficially, yet what B says may imply that "there is meat in that dinner, and I am a vegetarian, so I don‟t like it.” which makes the conversation coherent.
In (4) , B violates the maxim of manners. B may be deliberately obscure by saying in that way so that the children will not be able to understand what they are talking about.
11.What are the major types of semantic Changes?
There are mainly three kinds of semantic changes, namely, broadening, narrowing, and 【答案】
meaning shift. Class shift and folk etymology also contribute to change in meaning.
(1)Broadening
Broadening is a process to extend or elevate the meaning from its originally specific sense to a relatively general one. For instance , the word holiday used to mean“holy day‟‟in rel igious English. Today it means“a day for rest‟‟regardless of its religious nature.
(2)Narrowing
Contrary to broadening, the original meaning of a word can be narrowed or restricted to a specific sense. A typical example is the word meat which originally meant “ food”. In the course of time, the range of meaning was narrowed to mean specifically “ the flesh of animals used as food”.
(3 ) Meaning shift
All semantic changes involve meaning shift. Yet, in its narrow sense, meaning shift refers to the change of meaning, which has nothing to do with generalization or restriction. What makes the meaning of a word different is its departure from its original domain as a result of its metaphorical usage. For instance , the word bead originally means “prayer”, but later it refers to “the prayer bead”, the visible manifestation of a prayer, finally “small, ball-shaped piece of glass, metal or wood”.
(4)Class shift
By shifting the word class one can change the meaning of a word from a concrete entity or notion to a process or attribution. This process of word formation is also known as zero-derivation, or conversion. The word engineer as a noun means “a person trained in a branch of engineering”,but it means “to act as an engineer” or “to plan, to maneuver” when used as a verb.
(5)Folk etymology
It refers to a change in form of a word or phrase resulting from an incorrect popular notion of the origin or meaning of the term or from the influence of more familiar terms mistakenly taken to be analogous. As a result of this modification, the word sparrowgrass in English derived from asparagus; the Spanish cucaracha changed into English cockroach.
相关内容
相关标签